Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204760›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

An unsupervised map of excitatory neuron dendritic morphology in the mouse visual cortex.

Marissa A Weis, Stelios Papadopoulos, Laura Hansel, Timo Lüddecke, Brendan Celii, Paul G Fahey, Eric Y Wang, J Alexander Bae, Agnes L Bodor, Derrick Brittain and 38 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pronounced Neuroplasticity in the Primary Visual Cortex of the 13-Lined Ground Squirrel during Hibernation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Diversity in Whisking-Related Dynamics of Layer 5 Neurons in the Motor Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. The grand challenge in cellular neurophysiology.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors.

Marissa A WeisInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0993-7145
Stelios PapadopoulosCenter for Neuroscience and AI, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Laura HanselInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-2397
Timo LüddeckeInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Brendan CeliiCenter for Neuroscience and AI, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Paul G FaheyCenter for Neuroscience and AI, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-3551
Eric Y WangCenter for Neuroscience and AI, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
J Alexander BaePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4681-6342
Agnes L BodorAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8401-0756
Derrick BrittainAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
JoAnn BuchananAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-5560
Daniel J BumbargerAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Manuel A CastroPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Forrest CollmanAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0280-7022
Nuno Maçarico da CostaAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2001-4568
Sven DorkenwaldPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Leila ElabbadyAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Akhilesh HalageriPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Zhen JiaPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Chris JordanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Dan KapnerAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nico KemnitzPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0260-4532
Sam KinnAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kisuk LeePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Kai LiPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-7024
Ran LuPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Thomas MacrinaPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0622-9338
Gayathri MahalingamAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-5013
Eric MitchellPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7487-1744
Shanka Subhra MondalPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1252-0129
Shang MuPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Barak NehoranPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7371-0829
Sergiy PopovychPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
R Clay ReidAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8697-6797
Casey M Schneider-MizellAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9477-3853
H Sebastian SeungPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8591-6733
William SilversmithPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Marc TakenoAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8384-7500
Russel TorresAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2876-4382
Nicholas L TurnerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
William WongPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Jingpeng WuPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Wenjing YinAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Szi-Chieh YuPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9684-0156
Jacob ReimerCenter for Neuroscience and AI, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-8846
Philipp BerensHertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-4727
Andreas S ToliasCenter for Neuroscience and AI, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-6376
Alexander S EckerInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. ecker@cs.uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-5105

Funding

Generation of novel cell type specific mouse genetic toolsU19MH114830 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI PACHTER, LIOR S · 2017 to 2021
$64.7M
VISION RESEARCH CENTERP30EY002520 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Samuel M Wu · 1985 to 2026
$14.8M
Deciphering the building blocks of hippocampal circuitsR01MH109556 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SANDBERG, RICKARD, TOLIAS, ANDREAS · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Probabilistic coding in cortical populationsR01EY026927 · NEI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MA, WEI JI, TOLIAS, ANDREAS · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Anatomical connectivity and activity in primary visual cortex of mouseRF1MH130416 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI PITKOW, ZACHARY SAMUEL, REIMER, JACOB · 2022 to 2022
$1.3M
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 390727645EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101039115EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101041669NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002520NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026927NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109556NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH130416NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH114830ODNI | Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) D16PC00003ODNI | Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) D16PC00004ODNI | Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) D16PC00005U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) T32-EY-002520-37U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) U19MH114830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in the neocortex exhibit astonishing morphological diversity, which is critical for properly wiring neural circuits and giving neurons their functional properties. However, the organizational principles underlying this morphological diversity remain an open question. Here, we took a data-driven approach using graph-based machine learning methods to obtain a low-dimensional morphological "bar code" describing more than 30,000 excitatory neurons in mouse visual areas V1, AL, and RL that were reconstructed from the millimeter scale MICrONS serial-section electron microscopy volume. Contrary to previous classifications into discrete morphological types (m-types), our data-driven approach suggests that the morphological landscape of cortical excitatory neurons is better described as a continuum, with a few notable exceptions in layers 5 and 6. Dendritic morphologies in layers 2-3 exhibited a trend towards a decreasing width of the dendritic arbor and a smaller tuft with increasing cortical depth. Inter-area differences were most evident in layer 4, where V1 contained more atufted neurons than higher visual areas. Moreover, we discovered neurons in V1 on the border to layer 5, which avoided deeper layers with their dendrites. In summary, we suggest that excitatory neurons' morphological diversity is better understood by considering axes of variation than using distinct m-types.

Indexed as

DendritesNeuronsVisual CortexAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BL

Identifiers

PMID40204760
PMCPMC11982532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.