ArticleScientific reports2025
One-class support vector machines for detecting population drift in deployed machine learning medical diagnostics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being applied to diagnose and predict disease, but face technical challenges such as population drift, where the training and real-world deployed data distributions differ. This phenomenon can degrade model performance, risking incorrect diagnoses. Current detection methods are limited: not directly measuring population drift and often requiring ground truth labels for new patient data. Here, we propose using a one-class support vector machine (OCSVM) to detect population drift. We trained a OCSVM on the Wisconsin Breast Cancer dataset and tested its ability to detect population drift on simulated data. Simulated data was offset at 0.4 standard deviations of the minimum and maximum values of the radius_mean variable, at three noise levels: 5%, 10% and 30% of the standard deviation; 10,000 records per noise level. We hypothesised that increased noise would correlate with more OCSVM-detected inliers, indicating a sensitivity to population drift. As noise increased, more inliers were detected: 5% (27 inliers), 10% (486), and 30% (851). Therefore, this approach could effectively alert to population drift, supporting safe ML diagnostics adoption. Future research should explore OCSVM monitoring on real-world data, enhance model transparency, investigate complementary statistical and ML methods, and extend applications to other data types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.