ArticleScientific reports2025
Real-world evaluation of an intravenous iron service for the treatment of iron deficiency with or without anemia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous (IV) iron is a guideline-recommended treatment for iron deficiency when oral iron is contraindicated, ineffective, or not tolerated, or when rapid iron delivery is necessary. However, evidence suggests that some patients receive less IV iron than needed. This retrospective audit assessed the effectiveness and safety of ferric derisomaltose (FDI), a high-dose IV iron, in 2,468 patients. Efficacy outcomes assessed at 4-12 weeks post-infusion included changes in hemoglobin (Hb) and ferritin, proportion of courses (a course was defined as the treatment episode required to administer one total dose) after which patients were non-anemic (Hb ≥ 130 g/L [men] or ≥ 120 g/L [women]), and response rate (proportion of courses after which patients were non-anemic or Hb increased by ≥ 20 g/L). Safety was assessed through adverse events. Across 2,775 FDI courses, the mean dose was 1,244 mg, but mean estimated iron need was 1,580 mg. At follow-up, mean Hb had increased by 20.9 g/L and mean ferritin by 188.8 µg/L. Patients were non-anemic after 33.4% (n = 494/1,478) of courses and responded after 65.1% (n = 962/1,478) of courses. One patient (n = 1/2,468; 0.04%) had a serious allergic reaction. Patients remained anemic after > 65% of courses, demonstrating the need to optimize dosing based on iron need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.