Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204729›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Real-world evaluation of an intravenous iron service for the treatment of iron deficiency with or without anemia.

Roel Fijn, Hans C Ablij, Pieter D Knoester, Anne M C Witte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roel FijnDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Alrijne Healthcare Group, Leiden, The Netherlands. r.fijn@nwz.nl.
Hans C AblijDepartment of Internal Medicine & Nephrology, Alrijne Healthcare Group, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pieter D KnoesterDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Alrijne Healthcare Group, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anne M C WitteDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Alrijne Healthcare Group, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravenous (IV) iron is a guideline-recommended treatment for iron deficiency when oral iron is contraindicated, ineffective, or not tolerated, or when rapid iron delivery is necessary. However, evidence suggests that some patients receive less IV iron than needed. This retrospective audit assessed the effectiveness and safety of ferric derisomaltose (FDI), a high-dose IV iron, in 2,468 patients. Efficacy outcomes assessed at 4-12 weeks post-infusion included changes in hemoglobin (Hb) and ferritin, proportion of courses (a course was defined as the treatment episode required to administer one total dose) after which patients were non-anemic (Hb ≥ 130 g/L [men] or ≥ 120 g/L [women]), and response rate (proportion of courses after which patients were non-anemic or Hb increased by ≥ 20 g/L). Safety was assessed through adverse events. Across 2,775 FDI courses, the mean dose was 1,244 mg, but mean estimated iron need was 1,580 mg. At follow-up, mean Hb had increased by 20.9 g/L and mean ferritin by 188.8 µg/L. Patients were non-anemic after 33.4% (n = 494/1,478) of courses and responded after 65.1% (n = 962/1,478) of courses. One patient (n = 1/2,468; 0.04%) had a serious allergic reaction. Patients remained anemic after > 65% of courses, demonstrating the need to optimize dosing based on iron need.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyFerric CompoundsIronAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFerritinsHemoglobinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFerric CompoundsFerritinsHemoglobinsIron

Identifiers

PMID40204729
PMCPMC11982194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.