ArticleNature communications2025
The regulatory architecture of the primed pluripotent cell state.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptional Bursting in Pluripotent Stem Cells.Biology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite extensive research, the gene regulatory architecture governing mammalian cell states remains poorly understood. Here we present an integrative systems biology approach to elucidate the network architecture of primed state pluripotency. Using an unbiased methodology, we identified and experimentally confirmed 132 transcription factors as master regulators (MRs) of mouse epiblast stem cell (EpiSC) pluripotency, many of which were further validated by CRISPR-mediated functional assays. To assemble a comprehensive regulatory network, we silenced each of the 132 MRs to assess their effects on the other MRs and their transcriptional targets, yielding a network of 1273 MR → MR interactions. Network architecture analyses revealed four functionally distinct MR modules (communities), and identified key Speaker and Mediator MRs based on their hierarchical rank and centrality. Our findings elucidate the de-centralized logic of a "communal interaction" model in which the balanced activities of four MR communities maintain primed state pluripotency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.