Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204467›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2025

Estimating the effects of interventions on increasing vaccination: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jiayan Liu, Yingli Zhang, Haochun Zhang, Hao Tan

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiayan LiuSchool of Design, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-8972
Yingli ZhangSchool of Design, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2483-378X
Haochun ZhangSchool of Design, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3051-4813
Hao TanSchool of Design, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan, China htan@hnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-417X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As global vaccination rates have reached their lowest point in nearly 15 years, effective interventions are being required globally to promote vaccination; however, there is a lack of rigorous evaluation of the effect of various interventions. Through a global synthesis, we analysed data from approximately 6 125 795 participants across 319 studies in 41 countries to reveal the global landscape of four intervention themes and to assess their effectiveness in increasing vaccination rates. We found an overall positive effect of the interventions across four main themes on improving vaccination. Specifically, dialogue-based interventions increased vaccination rates by 43.1% (95% CI: 29.8 to 57.9%, with effect sizes measured as relative risks (RRs)), though they may not always be effective in adolescents or in the sample with a higher percentage of male participants. Incentive-based interventions, whether implemented alone or combined with other intervention themes, failed to demonstrate a significant effect in children. Reminder/recall-based interventions were also effective for promoting vaccination (38.5% increase, 95% CI: 28.9 to 48.9%), particularly for completing vaccine series. Multi-component interventions exhibited excellent effectiveness in vaccination (54.3% increase, 95% CI: 40.5 to 69.6%), with the combination of dialogue, incentive and reminder/recall proving more effective than other multi-component interventions, but showing no significant effects in populations with high initial vaccination rates. However, we found that in most cases combining additional interventions with a single intervention may not significantly improve their effectiveness, especially for incentive-based interventions, but dialogue-based and reminder/recall-based interventions appear to be beneficial in some specific combinations. These findings underscore the importance of governments, public health officials and advocacy groups implementing appropriate vaccine interventions by selecting interventions tailored to specific populations, strategically promoting the completion of vaccine series and effectively combining interventions to promote global vaccination and save more lives.

Indexed as

Health PromotionImmunization ProgramsVaccinationAdolescentGlobal HealthHumansMotivationPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40204467
PMCPMC11987150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.