ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Constraints on percussive seismic signals in a noisy environment by European fiddler crabs, Afruca tangeri.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many animals communicate using seismic vibrations. Signaller morphology, signal production method and environmental factors impose interacting constraints that may be impossible to replicate in the laboratory, making it essential to study seismic communication in situ. Here, we focused on the constraints on percussive seismic signals in European fiddler crabs (Afruca tangeri), recording a large dataset of percussive seismic signals in situ, and testing for waveform differences as a function of signaller morphology and behaviour. In addition, we aimed to characterise signal degradation and interference by seismic noise from wind and vibrated vegetation in the natural environment. We obtained over 8000 percussive seismic signal recordings, and found that although the length, rhythm and loudness of the signals all varied as a function of behaviour, their frequency content did not. Consequently, behaviours could be discriminated based on seismic recordings alone. Larger claws were only associated with louder signals in the case of claw drumming behaviours, but morphology did not affect percussive signal features otherwise. Environmental effects on percussive signals were substantial as signals attenuated significantly over distance, and wind speed was positively correlated with seismic noise, albeit independently of distance to vegetation. We conclude that percussive seismic signals are limited in their ability to convey information through frequency, but that their broadband nature is advantageous in the face of noise and frequency filtering by the substrate. In contrast, changing the amplitude and repetition rate of a percussive signal offers a simple but effective means for small animals to communicate seismically in noisy environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.