Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204456›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025

Constraints on percussive seismic signals in a noisy environment by European fiddler crabs, Afruca tangeri.

Tom Mulder, Yiyuan Yang, Ellen Morley, Thomas E Miller, Daniel Hending, Graham K Taylor, Beth Mortimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tom MulderUniversity of Oxford, Department of Biology, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3246-119X
Yiyuan YangUniversity of Oxford, Department of Computer Science, 7 Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-095X
Ellen MorleyUniversity of Oxford, Department of Biology, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-7730-6417
Thomas E MillerUniversity of Oxford, Department of Biology, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9647-570X
Daniel HendingUniversity of Oxford, Department of Biology, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0609-4354
Graham K TaylorUniversity of Oxford, Department of Biology, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-755X
Beth MortimerUniversity of Oxford, Department of Biology, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7230-3647

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/S007474/1Royal Society URF/R1/191033St Anne's College, University of OxfordSt John's College, University of OxfordThe Company of BiologistsUKRIUniversity of Oxford
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animals communicate using seismic vibrations. Signaller morphology, signal production method and environmental factors impose interacting constraints that may be impossible to replicate in the laboratory, making it essential to study seismic communication in situ. Here, we focused on the constraints on percussive seismic signals in European fiddler crabs (Afruca tangeri), recording a large dataset of percussive seismic signals in situ, and testing for waveform differences as a function of signaller morphology and behaviour. In addition, we aimed to characterise signal degradation and interference by seismic noise from wind and vibrated vegetation in the natural environment. We obtained over 8000 percussive seismic signal recordings, and found that although the length, rhythm and loudness of the signals all varied as a function of behaviour, their frequency content did not. Consequently, behaviours could be discriminated based on seismic recordings alone. Larger claws were only associated with louder signals in the case of claw drumming behaviours, but morphology did not affect percussive signal features otherwise. Environmental effects on percussive signals were substantial as signals attenuated significantly over distance, and wind speed was positively correlated with seismic noise, albeit independently of distance to vegetation. We conclude that percussive seismic signals are limited in their ability to convey information through frequency, but that their broadband nature is advantageous in the face of noise and frequency filtering by the substrate. In contrast, changing the amplitude and repetition rate of a percussive signal offers a simple but effective means for small animals to communicate seismically in noisy environments.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationBrachyuraNoiseAnimalsVibrationWindBiomechanicsCourtshipGeophonesPercussionVibrational communication

Identifiers

PMID40204456
PMCPMC12045639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.