SynthesisBMJ open gastroenterology2025
eHealth interventions and patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk of Dementia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping GLP-1 receptor agonist research across the MASLD-MASH-HCC continuum: a bibliometric and translational analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- MRI in MASLD: technical foundations and guideline-based applications.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Lifespan approaches for the prevention and management of steatotic liver disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- A Supervised, Online, Home-Based Eccentric Resistance Exercise Program for Patients With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Gastroenterology research · 2026Article
- Overcoming the barriers in the screening, diagnosis, and follow-up of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Using an integrative multi-omics and in vitro approach to investigate the role of tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate in promoting hepatic steatosis.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Evidence Summary for Self-Management Education in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- From Isolation to Information: Launching an Online Community for Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, and Autoimmune Hepatitis in Romania-A Descriptive Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Information Deficits, Information Needs, and Preferences Regarding eHealth in a Dutch Population With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- A Systemic Perspective of the Link Between Microbiota and Cardiac Health: A Literature Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing global health concern, with increasing mortality rates driven by the obesity pandemic. Weight loss has been shown to improve MASLD outcomes, yet the effectiveness of eHealth interventions in MASLD management remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of eHealth interventions compared with standard care in improving health outcomes among patients with MASLD.
designA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Central and Embase databases from inception to 26 April 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only double-arm clinical trials involving human participants diagnosed with MASLD were included. Eligible studies were limited to those published in English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: eHealth interventions-including internet-based platforms, smartwatches, telephone follow-ups and mobile applications for dietary and exercise modifications-were compared against traditional intervention methods. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in body weight, abdominal/waist circumference, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT). Secondary outcomes were changes in body mass index (BMI), diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, MASLD fibrosis score, high-density lipoprotein, gamma-glutamyl transferase and triglycerides.
results11 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 10 provided relevant outcomes and were included. The mean age of participants across the studies ranged from 39.3 to 57.9 years, with intervention durations spanning 3 to 24 months. Our results indicate significant improvements with eHealth interventions compared with control comparators, including reductions in AST (standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.35 (95% CI -0.61, -0.10); p<0.05), ALT (SMD: -0.38 (95% CI -0.65, -0.11); p<0.05), weight loss (SMD: -0.38 (95% CI -0.60, -0.17); p<0.05) and BMI (SMD: -0.37 (95% CI -0.54, -0.21); p<0.05).
conclusionsThe utilisation of eHealth interventions showed significant improvements in outcomes related to AST, ALT, abdominal circumference, weight loss and BMI. However, future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are warranted to assess the sustainability of these outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.