ArticleBMJ open2025
Efficacy and safety of electrical stimulation for functional impairment and pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSeveral studies have indicated that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, functional electrical stimulation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation and electroacupuncture exhibit certain therapeutic effects in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, definitive proof of the effectiveness of different types of electrical stimulation in relieving the different symptomatic manifestations of RA is required. This study aims to analyse the efficacy (health assessment questionnaire, visual analogue scale, etc), safety (adverse reactions) of electrical stimulation for functional impairment (morning stiffness and decreased muscle strength) and pain (joint tenderness and swelling) of RA, and to explore their comparative advantages and potential benefits for patients.
methodsWe will conduct a systematic and comprehensive search of eight databases, and the search will proceed from the beginning to 5 September 2024. Two reviewers will independently screen the retrieved literature to determine the final included studies. Two reviewers will independently assess the risk of bias for all included eligible studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (V.2.0). Data synthesis will be performed using a random-effects model for network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different electrical stimulations. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve will be used to demonstrate the probability of the benefits and harms of interventions. Funnel plots will be used to detect potential publication bias and small sample study effects. The strength of the evidence will be assessed through the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study data comes from public databases, and the entire study does not directly involve patients and the public, so ethical approval is not required. The final study results will be peer-reviewed and published in a journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024586835.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.