Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204319›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Evaluating musculoskeletal imaging communication interventions using behavioural science: a scoping review using the COM-B model.

Edward Kirby, Andrew MacMillan, Andrew Brinkley, Bernard X W Liew, Andrew Bateman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edward KirbySchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK ed@edkirbyphysio.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8105-6505
Andrew MacMillanOutpatient Physiotherapy, Connect Health Ltd, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Andrew BrinkleyUniversity of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Bernard X W LiewSchool of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-7548
Andrew BatemanUniversity of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesClinicians and patients have been found to attribute musculoskeletal (MSK) pain to normal age-related changes seen on imaging, which can negatively impact patient outcomes and increase healthcare costs. While some studies have tested interventions to improve how MSK imaging findings are communicated, their impact has been limited. Applying a behavioural science framework has the potential to identify the rationale and target of these interventions to inform future intervention design-an analysis that has not yet been conducted. This study aims to identify the Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs), the behavioural targets and the theoretical basis of interventions seeking to affect the communication of MSK imaging.

designScoping review using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour (COM-B) model. DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO from inception to 9 February 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included studies that have developed or evaluated interventions which target the communication of MSK imaging findings. Interventions targeting both patients and clinicians were included. Experimental and quasi-experimental study designs were included, and studies that focused on serious or specific known causes of MSK pain were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent authors extracted study participant data and intervention details. A theory of behaviour called the COM-B model was used to map the BCTs and behavioural components targeted by studies.

resultsWe identified 11 studies from 2486 studies in our electronic search. 11 different BCTs were identified across 11 studies. The most common techniques were framing/reframing (nine studies), adding objects to the environment (eight studies), incompatible beliefs (seven studies) and avoidance/reducing exposure to cues for the behaviour (four studies). Only two studies (feasibility studies) used behavioural theory to guide their intervention design. While one study showed a large effect, most interventions had little to no impact on pain, disability, or fear over time.

conclusionThis review highlighted a lack of studies targeting clinician knowledge and the provision of high-quality patient resources about the nature of MSK pain, even though the broader literature identifies both as enablers of effective health communication. Additionally, the absence of a theory-informed design likely resulted in attempts to reassure patients about normal age-related imaging findings without providing an alternate, more coherent explanation for symptoms. Future interventions should focus on enhancing clinician psychological capability (knowledge) as well as clinician and patient reflective motivation (beliefs) to enable more helpful explanations of MSK symptoms. The key challenge for future interventions will be achieving these aims in a way that is effective, consistent and practical. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ECYS8).

Indexed as

Behavioral SciencesCommunicationDiagnostic ImagingMusculoskeletal DiseasesMusculoskeletal PainPhysician-Patient RelationsHumansMotivationBehaviorDiagnostic ImagingMusculoskeletal disordersSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID40204319
PMCPMC11987107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.