ArticleBMJ open2025
Designing and validating a patient education model for cardiovascular patients: protocol for a multilevel mixed-method study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intention to Engage in Exercise Rehabilitation Among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Scoping Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient education is an integral component of advanced nursing care. However, current educational practice approaches exhibit numerous deficiencies and have not yielded favourable outcomes. The models used for educating patients with cardiovascular conditions lack specificity for these patients, and each addresses only a particular aspect of patient education. Consequently, this study aims to describe the process of designing and validating a patient education model for the cardiovascular community. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will employ a multilevel mixed design, encompassing 'evidence analysis and context explanation' and 'validity testing'. The linking phase, namely, model design, will connect the two phases by building a preliminary model based on findings from the first phase. The evidence analysis and context explanation phase will involve three key steps. First, a scoping review will identify existing patient education processes and frameworks through a comprehensive literature search that includes qualitative and quantitative studies, review articles, mixed-methods research and developmental studies. This review aims to map existing evidence and provide an overview of current constructs in patient education, such as models, theories, frameworks, protocols and methods. Second, stakeholder experience elucidation will use conventional content analysis to explore stakeholders' experiences, including nurses, patient education managers, physicians, patients and their families regarding current patient education practices. Third, situational analysis will evaluate human resources by assessing the performance of nurses and physicians in delivering patient education while also analysing non-human resources by examining the physical space and materials for patient education, evaluating current educational content and assessing educational outcomes. In the linking phase (model design), data collected during Phase One will be integrated to create an initial construct derived from the scoping review. This construct will be refined through content analysis and clarified using situational analysis data. The third phase (model validation) will focus on internal and external validation. For internal validation, a Delphi study will achieve expert consensus on the proposed model, involving specialists engaged in patient education who will evaluate its elements. For external validation, the model will undergo pilot testing in clinical settings to assess its utility by measuring outcomes for cardiac patients, such as self-care, quality of life, patient education satisfaction and treatment adherence. After the validation process, the final patient education model will be reviewed and finalised based on insights gained during both study phases. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committee at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR.TBZMED.REC.1402.670). Dissemination will be achieved by publishing findings and depositing data in a publicly accessible repository to ensure transparency and facilitate future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.