ArticleBMJ open2025
Impact of potentially inappropriate psychotropic medicines on falls among older adults in 23 residential aged care facilities in Australia: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of family doctors on gradient utilization of health services among diabetic patients: evidence from a real-world study.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFalling is common among older adults in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) and potential inappropriate psychotropic medicines (PIPMs) use may increase the risk of falling. This study aimed to determine the impact of PIPMs on falls using longitudinal observational data.
methodsA retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted using routinely collected electronic health data from 23 RACFs in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. The study included 3064 permanent residents aged ≥65 (2020-2021). PIPMs were identified using updated Beers criteria 2023. We considered three fall outcome groups: all falls, injurious falls and falls requiring hospitalisation. The falls incidence rates (IRs) were calculated for overall residents in RACFs as well as for central nervous system (CNS)-PIPM users and non-users. We applied a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model to assess the association between falls and CNS-PIPMs.
resultsA total of 40% (n=1224) of long-term care residents used at least one CNS-PIPM and 10% of residents (n=302) used two or more. The falls IRs of CNS-PIPM users were 16.2 falls per 1000 resident days (95% CI 15.9 to 16.5) for all falls, 5.68 falls per 1000 resident days (95% CI 5.48 to 5.88) for injurious falls and 1.77 falls per 1000 resident days (95% CI 1.66 to 1.88) for falls requiring hospitalisation, whereas the falls IRs of non-CNS-PIPM users were 10.8 falls per 1000 resident days (95% CI 10.6 to 11.0) for all falls, 3.65 falls per 1000 resident days (95% CI 3.52 to 3.78) for injurious falls and 1.26 falls per 1000 resident days (95% CI 1.19 to 1.33) for falls requiring hospitalisation. CNS-PIPM users had a significantly greater rate of falls overall compared with non-users (IRR 1.29; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.44) for all outcomes.
conclusionsFalls are frequent among CNS-PIPM users resulting in injury and hospitalisation, with 70% of CNS-PIPM users falling at least once and one in three requiring admissions to hospital. Reviewing residents' use of psychotropic medicines should be considered as part of strategies to reduce falls incidence among older adults in RACFs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.