ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2025
Integrative biophysical characterization of molecular interactions: A case study with the sfGFP-nanobody complex.
Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Aotearoa: A Brief History of the Technique and its Place Among Other Tools Used to Investigate Biomolecular Interactions.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compares several analytical biophysical methods for investigating protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in solution, using the interaction between superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) and its anti-sfGFP nanobody enhancer as a model system. Techniques evaluated include microscale thermophoresis, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, analytical ultracentrifugation with multi-wavelength and fluorescence detection, isothermal titration calorimetry, and analytical size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle static light scattering and dynamic light scattering. Each method was assessed for information content, dynamic range, precision, and complementarity. The results consistently indicate a single-digit nanomolar dissociation constant and 1:1 stoichiometry for the interaction. While each technique offers unique insights into binding affinity, thermodynamics, and stoichiometry of the interaction, the multi-method approach provides a more complete and reliable characterization of PPIs. The study demonstrates how combining multiple complementary techniques enhances the robustness of PPI analysis in solution-phase conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.