ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Analysis of 4616 clinical trial initial submissions received by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between February 2019 and October 2023.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Special Populations in Pivotal Clinical Trials: Eligibility and Supporting Evidence for Exclusion in EMA-Authorised Medicines.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency's introduction of a risk-proportionate approach for clinical trials: An analysis of 4617 applications assessed between September 2023 and August 2024.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Challenges and solutions to participation in mental health clinical trials: Count Me In 2.0.BMJ mental health · 2026Article
- Innovative design and modelling to improve sex and gender analysis in clinical trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Analysis of 4616 clinical trial initial submissions received by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between February 2019 and October 2023.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- A call to strengthen clinical trials capacity in resource-limited settings.BMJ global health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to analyse clinical trial initial submissions received by the MHRA between February 2019 and October 2023.
methodsData on submissions were extracted from the clinical trials unit data bank. The primary end-point was the type of clinical trial initial submissions. Secondary end-points were sponsor types, participant demographics, healthy volunteers, health categories and studies involving first in human and advanced therapy medicinal products. The analysis used descriptive statistics for all categorical variables.
resultsMHRA received 4616 submissions. The highest percentage was in 2020 (22.8%) and the lowest in 2023 (17.2%). Phase 3 submissions were the highest (32.6%) and and phase 4 the lowest (5.2%). Commercial sponsors represented 85.1% of the total submissions. Both sexes were included in most trials (90%), while the number of submissions involving females only (3.7%) was lower than male only trials (6.1%). The elderly population was represented in 67.7% of trials with pregnant and breastfeeding women represented in 1.1% and 0.6% of trials, respectively. Breastfeeding women were not included in phase 1. Paediatric trials mostly involved adolescents. Healthy volunteers were included in 16.5% of the total submissions. The most common health category was cancer (29.4%), with the lowest being pain. First in human submissions represented 12.7% and advanced therapy medicinal products 3.4% of submissions.
conclusionsThese results highlight the clinical trial landscape in the United Kingdom and represent an important baseline for policymakers, healthcare providers, sponsors and patients and will enable an assessment of how policy changes can improve the variety and number of clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.