Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40203666›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2025

Hypothetical demand for menthol and non-menthol cigarettes and substitution among people who smoke menthol cigarettes: A within subjects between group randomized controlled trial using the experimental tobacco marketplace.

Amanda J Quisenberry, Lovina John, Richard O'Connor, Elizabeth G Klein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03897530 (Flavored Tobacco Product Regulation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03897530 naterminatednot on this map

Flavored Tobacco Product Regulation: Behavioral Economic Demand, Visual Attention, and Flavored Tobacco Product Availability

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoswell Park Cancer InstituteRan2019 to 2023Enrolled103ConditionsCigarette SmokingArmsSmoking Cessation Intervention, Functional Assessment, Questionnaire Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda J QuisenberryDepartment of Health Behavior, Carlton House A-408, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States. Electronic address: Amanda.quisenberry@roswellpark.org.
Lovina JohnDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Richard O'ConnorDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Elizabeth G KleinHeath Behavior and Health Promotion, The Ohio State University, 1841 Neil Avenue, 352 Cunz Hall, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.

Funding

Flavored Tobacco Product Regulation: Behavioral Economic Demand, Visual Attention, and Flavored Tobacco Product AvailabilityR03CA228930 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI QUISENBERRY, AMANDA J · 2018 to 2019
$175k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA228930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Food and Drug Administration has recently released a final rule enacting a characterizing flavor ban in cigarettes and cigars. Similar efforts have been proposed for e-cigarettes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a potential menthol cigarette ban, a fruit and mint flavored e-cigarette ban, and the interaction of the two among current adults who smoke menthol cigarettes.

methodsThe Experimental Tobacco Marketplace was used to evaluate the within subject purchasing of participants who smoke menthol major name brand (n = 64) and Native manufactured (n = 37) cigarettes when fixed price alternatives and only: 1) menthol cigarettes and mint and fruit flavored e-cigarettes, 2) non-menthol cigarettes and mint and fruit flavored e-cigarettes, 3) menthol cigarettes and tobacco flavored e-cigarettes, and 4) non-menthol cigarettes and tobacco flavored e-cigarettes were available.

resultsParticipants who smoked major name brand and Native manufactured menthol cigarettes showed greater cigarette demand (Q CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Demand for cigarettes is higher when preferred flavor is available. Substitutes for cigarettes among people who smoke menthol cigarettes are minimal and may indicate that removal of menthol from the landscape may not push people who smoke menthol cigarettes to products other than cigarettes. DATA AVAILABILITY: The data utilized in this paper are available by request from corresponding author, AJQ, given the participants in this study did not consent to have their data shared with the public. Following publication of primary and secondary results, the corresponding author will provide de-identified data and a data dictionary for requests. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV ID AND TITLE: NCT03897530; Experimental Tobacco Marketplace in Regulating Flavored Tobacco Products in Menthol Cigarette Smokers.

Indexed as

MentholTobacco ProductsAdultConsumer BehaviorElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleFlavoring AgentsHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung AdultFlavoring AgentsMentholBehavioral economicsExperimental tobacco marketplaceMenthol

Identifiers

PMID40203666
PMCPMC12050197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.