Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40203295›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.)2025

Diagnostic accuracy of ECG and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide for cardiac dysfunction among asymptomatic long-term breast cancer survivors.

Rachel Knol, Laurine T van der Wal, Jozine M Ter Maaten, Geertruida H de Bock, Saskia W M C Maass, Daan Brandenbarg

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel KnolUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Primary and Long-term Care, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Laurine T van der WalUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Primary and Long-term Care, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jozine M Ter MaatenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology.
Geertruida H de BockUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Saskia W M C MaassUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Primary and Long-term Care, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Daan BrandenbargUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Primary and Long-term Care, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith a growing population of breast cancer survivors, it is important to acknowledge long-term consequences of breast cancer treatment, including left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Although echocardiography is a reliable technique to diagnose LVSD, its limited accessibility in primary care poses challenges.

methodsA cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study among 350 long-term breast cancer survivors, at least 5 years after breast cancer diagnosis, comparing the diagnostic performance of index tests ECG and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to the reference test echocardiography. LVSD was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 54% or LVEF less than 50% on echocardiography.

resultsThe median age at time of investigation was 63 years (IQR 57-68), with a median follow-up duration since breast cancer diagnosis of 10 years (IQR 7-14). An abnormal ECG demonstrated a sensitivity of 63.0% (IQR 48.7-75.7), a corresponding specificity of 51.7 (IQR 45.8-57.6) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.7 (IQR 0.5-1.0) for detecting a LVEF less than 54%. An abnormal ECG showed a sensitivity of 75.0 (IQR 47.6-92.7), a corresponding specificity of 50.6 (IQR 45.1-56.2) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.5 (0.2-1.2) for detecting LVSD defined as LVEF less than 50%. The area under the curve for NT-proBNP was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.68) for detecting LVEF less than 54% and 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.74) for detecting LVEF less than 50%. DISCUSSION: ECG and NT-proBNP are inadequate diagnostic tools to screen for LVSD among asymptomatic long-term breast cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsElectrocardiographyNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, LeftAgedAsymptomatic DiseasesBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)breast cancercardiac dysfunctionechoelectrocardiography

Identifiers

PMID40203295
PMCPMC12061371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.