ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2025
Men's Voices on Long-Acting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Delivery Modalities: Acceptability and Preferences Among Cisgender Men and Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Africa.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn sub-Saharan Africa, cisgender men-in particular men who have sex with women (MSW) and, to a lesser degree, men who have sex with men (MSM)-are often under-represented in HIV prevention research, despite their own HIV risk and role in transmission cycles. As HIV prevention research on long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA PrEP) options expands in sub-Saharan Africa, it is essential to engage these populations to ensure their acceptability. We investigated perceptions of implants and intramuscular injectables as LA PrEP delivery among MSW and MSM.
methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted between October 2020 and March 2021 with 40 MSW (n = 20) and MSM (n = 20), aged 18-35 years, self-reported as HIV negative, sexually active, and residing in resource-restricted communities in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa. We explored factors influencing LA PrEP attitudes. Data analysis followed a thematic framework approach.
resultsMSW and MSM found LA PrEP administration modes more acceptable than daily oral PrEP because they offered longer lasting protection while reducing frequent clinic visits for refills. MSW voiced hesitancy around the use of "foreign products," fearing infertility and congenital disabilities in their future children. Both subgroups acknowledged the convenience of implants with long-dosing duration, but injections were deemed to be more discrete and familiar. Both groups described implant use as potentially stigmatizing, with a greater chance of causing tissue scarring from insertion and removal procedures.
conclusionsEvidence relating to men's engagement in HIV prevention and acceptable modalities of HIV prevention is limited. We found that both groups were enthusiastic about LA PrEP, informing the development of our subsequent clinical study to provide further insight into using placebo versions of LA PrEP and future implementation of LA PrEP options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.