Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40203229›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Global burden and future trends of head and neck cancer: a deep learning-based analysis (1980-2030).

Qiongyuan Hu, Shuai Lv, Xinyu Wang, Peng Pan, Wei Gong, Jinyu Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Personalized scan path planning for robotic ultrasound in head and neck lesions.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Special Issue "Pathogenesis and Treatments of Head and Neck Cancer".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiongyuan HuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8370-7638
Shuai LvSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1154-3612
Xinyu WangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Peng PanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Wei GongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jinyu MeiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHead and neck cancer (HNC) becomes a vital global health burden. Accurate assessment of the disease burden plays an essential role in setting health priorities and guiding decision-making.

methodsThis study explores data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study, involving totally 204 countries during the period from 1980 to 2021. The analysis focuses on age-standardized incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for HNC. A Transformer-based model, HNCP-T, is used for the prediction of future trends from 2022 to 2030, quantified based on the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC).

resultsThe global age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) for HNC has escalated between 1980 and 2021, with men bearing a higher burden than women. In addition, the burden rises with age and exhibits regional disparities, with the greatest impact on low-to-middle sociodemographic index (SDI) regions. Additionally, the model predicts a continued rise in ASIR (EAPC = 0.22), while the age-standardized death rate (ASDR) is shown to decrease more sharply for women (EAPC = -0.92) than men (EAPC = -0.54). The most rapid increase in ASIR is projected for low-to-middle SDI countries, while ASDR and DALY rates are found to decrease in different degrees across regions.

conclusionsThe current work offers a detailed analysis of the global burden of HNC based on the GBD 2021 dataset and demonstrates the accuracy of the HNCP-T model in predicting future trends. Significant regional and gender-based differences are found, with incidence rates rising, especially among women and in low-middle SDI regions. Furthermore, the results underscore the value of deep learning models in disease burden prediction, which can outperform traditional methods.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlobal Burden of DiseaseHead and Neck NeoplasmsAdultAgedDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID40203229
PMCPMC11981659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.