Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40203217›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Preparation of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Products for Companion Animals.

Nina K Randolph, Matthew Salerno, Hannah Klein, Dubraska Diaz-Campos, Joany C van Balen, Jenessa A Winston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nina K RandolphDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Matthew SalernoDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Hannah KleinDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Dubraska Diaz-CamposDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Joany C van BalenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Jenessa A WinstonDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5323-7683

Funding

Short Trem Research Training for Veterinary StudentsT35OD010977 · OD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Christine A Petersen · 2012 to 2026
$1.1M
NIH HHS T35 OD010977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is increasingly utilized in small animal medicine for the treatment of a variety of gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal disorders. Despite proven clinical efficacy, there is no detailed protocol available for the preparation and storage of FMT products for veterinarians in a variety of clinical settings. Herein, the effect of processing technique on the microbial community structure was assessed with amplicon sequence analysis. Microbial viability was assessed with standard culture techniques using selective media. Given the fastidious nature of many intestinal microbes, colony forming units are considered surrogate viable microbes, representing a portion of potentially viable microbes. FMT products from four screened canine fecal donors and six screened feline fecal donors were processed aerobically according to a double centrifugation protocol adapted from the human medical literature. Fresh feces from an additional three screened canine fecal donors were used to evaluate the effect of cryopreservative, centrifugation, and short-term storage on microbial community structure and in vitro surrogate bacterial viability. Finally, fresh feces from a third group of three screened canine and three screened feline fecal donors were used to evaluate the long-term in vitro surrogate bacterial viability of three frozen and lyophilized FMT products. Microbiota analysis revealed that each canine fecal donor has a unique microbial profile. Processing of canine and feline feces for FMT does not significantly alter the overall microbial community structure. The addition of cryopreservatives and lyopreservatives significantly improved long-term viability, up to 6 months, for frozen and lyophilized FMT products compared to unprocessed raw feces with no cryopreservative. These results prove the practicality of this approach for FMT preparation in veterinary medicine and provide a detailed protocol for researchers and companion animal practitioners. Future in vivo research is needed to evaluate how the preparation and microbial viability of FMT impacts the recipient's microbial community and clinical outcomes across multiple disease phenotypes.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesPetsAnimalsCatsDogsMicrobial Viability

Identifiers

PMID40203217
PMCPMC11981653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.