GuidelineBJS open2025
Swedish national guidelines for diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in adults and children.
Guideline in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modified enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for pediatric complicated appendicitis in a Mexican tertiary hospital: a randomized clinical trial.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Trial
- C-Reactive protein and the CALLY index for predicting complicated appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study of 5,428 patients.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Bacterial Etiology and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns in Pediatric Intra-Abdominal Infections-Implications for Empirical Treatment and Antimicrobial Stewardship.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Open-Label Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Gentamicin in Comparison to Other Antibiotics in the Management of Acute Appendicitis in Surgically Treated Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A National survey of surgeons' perspectives on the treatment of adults with acute appendicitis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Endoscopic drainage and one-stage titanium clip closure for appendiceal root abscess mimicking cecal submucosal tumor: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and differential diagnosis model of IgAV with gastrointestinal symptoms and acute abdominal disease: an observational controlled study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- Postoperative outcomes following institutional antibiotic protocol changes in complicated pediatric appendicitis.World journal of pediatric surgery · 2026Article
- Incidental appendectomy during laparotomy for idiopathic intussusception in children: a dual-center retrospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Concealed Peritonitis Due to Stomach Perforation from a Fish Otolith: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Article
- Renal compression caused by a giant retroperitoneal appendiceal abscess in a child: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Differences in the management of this large group of patients has important consequences for the patients and the healthcare system. Controversies regarding the understanding of the natural course of the disease, the utility of new diagnostic methods, and alternative treatments have lead to large variations in practice patterns between centres. These national guidelines present evidence-based recommendations aiming at a uniform, safe and cost-efficient management of this large group of patients.
methodA working group of six experts with broad clinical and research experience was formed. Additional expertise from outside was consulted during the process. A national survey revealed significant variations in the management of patients with suspicion of appendicitis. The evidence provided in published guidelines and reviews were extracted and systematically graded, according to the GRADE methodology. This was supplemented by additional more recent and more directed search of the literature. Patients treated for appendicitis were involved through interviews. The guidelines were reviewed by external experts before the final version was determined.
resultsThe guidelines cover an extensive number of issues: pathology, epidemiology, aetiology, natural history, clinical and laboratory diagnosis, diagnostic scoring systems, diagnostic imaging, treatment, nursing care, follow-up, quality registers and quality indicators, among others. Special considerations related to children and pregnant women are covered.
conclusionThese national guidelines present an extensive and thorough review of the current knowledge base related to appendicitis, and provide up-to-date evidence-based recommendations for the management of this large group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.