ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Approximating edit distances between complex tandem repeats efficiently.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationExtended tandem repeats (TRs) have been associated with 60 or more diseases over the past 30 years. Although most TRs have single repeat units (or motifs), complex TRs with different units have recently been correlated with some brain disorders. Of note, a population-scale analysis shows that complex TRs at one locus can be divergent, and different units are often expanded between individuals. To understand the evolution of high TR diversity, it is informative to visualize a phylogenetic tree. To do this, we need to measure the edit distance between pairs of complex TRs by considering duplication and contraction of units created by replication slippage. However, traditional rigorous algorithms for this purpose are computationally expensive.
resultsWe here propose an efficient heuristic algorithm to estimate the edit distance with duplication and contraction of units (EDDC, for short). We select a set of frequent units that occur in given complex TRs, encode each unit as a single symbol, compress a TR into an optimal series of unit symbols that partially matches the original TR with the minimum Levenshtein distance, and estimate the EDDC between a pair of complex TRs from their compressed forms. Using substantial synthetic benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that the estimated EDDC is highly correlated with the accurate EDDC, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of >0.983, while the heuristic algorithm achieves orders of magnitude performance speedup. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software program hEDDC that implements the proposed algorithm is available at https://github.com/Ricky-pon/hEDDC (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14732958).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.