Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40203061›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Sawfish: improving long-read structural variant discovery and genotyping with local haplotype modeling.

Christopher T Saunders, James M Holt, Daniel N Baker, Juniper A Lake, Jonathan R Belyeu, Zev Kronenberg, William J Rowell, Michael A Eberle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. cuteHap: Haplotype-Aware Structural Variant Detection in Phased Long-Read Sequencing Data.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A complete diploid human genome benchmark for personalized genomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher T SaundersComputational Biology, PacBio, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0726-7600
James M HoltComputational Biology, PacBio, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6411-9236
Daniel N BakerComputational Biology, PacBio, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.
Juniper A LakeComputational Biology, PacBio, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7628-5645
Jonathan R BelyeuComputational Biology, PacBio, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5470-8299
Zev KronenbergComputational Biology, PacBio, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7627-9808
William J RowellComputational Biology, PacBio, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7422-1194
Michael A EberleComputational Biology, PacBio, Menlo Park, CA 94025, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8965-1253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationStructural variants (SVs) play an important role in evolutionary and functional genomics but are challenging to characterize. High-accuracy, long-read sequencing can substantially improve SV characterization when coupled with effective calling methods. While state-of-the-art long-read SV callers are highly accurate, further improvements are achievable by systematically modeling local haplotypes during SV discovery and genotyping.

resultsWe describe sawfish, an SV caller for mapped high-quality long reads incorporating systematic SV haplotype modeling to improve accuracy and resolution. Assessment against the draft Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) SV benchmark from the T2T-HG002-Q100 diploid assembly shows that sawfish has the highest accuracy among state-of-the-art long-read SV callers across every tested SV size group. Additionally, sawfish maintains the highest accuracy at every tested depth level from 10- to 32-fold coverage, such that other callers required at least 30-fold coverage to match sawfish accuracy at 15-fold coverage. Sawfish also shows the highest accuracy in the GIAB challenging medically relevant genes benchmark, demonstrating improvements in both comprehensive and medically relevant contexts.When joint-genotyping seven samples from CEPH-1463, sawfish has over 9000 more pedigree-concordant calls than other state-of-the-art SV callers, with the highest proportion of concordant SVs (81%). Sawfish's quality model enables selection for an even higher proportion of concordant SVs (88%), while still calling nearly 5000 more pedigree-concordant SVs than other callers. These results demonstrate that sawfish improves on the state-of-the-art for long-read SV calling accuracy across both individual and joint-sample analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Sawfish source code, pre-compiled Linux binaries, and documentation are released on GitHub: https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/sawfish.

Indexed as

Genomic Structural VariationGenotyping TechniquesHaplotypesSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareGenome, HumanGenomicsGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumans

Identifiers

PMID40203061
PMCPMC12000528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.