SynthesisPloS one2025
Occupational respiratory symptoms and associated factors among street sweepers in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Respiratory Diseases and Associated Factors among Seafood Processing Workers in Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In low- and middle-income countries, occupational exposure continues to be a serious public health concern. Because of their working conditions, street sweepers are particularly vulnerable to health hazards, with respiratory issues being the most common. The lack of comprehensive and inconsistence evidence on occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers, which exacerbates this issue. This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of occupational respiratory symptoms and associated factors among street sweepers in low- and middle-income countries. A comprehensive search strategy was carried out using various databases, such as PubMed, Scientific Direct, HINARI and Google Scholar, and the grey literature. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses were used. Microsoft Excel was used to extract the data, which was then transferred to STATA 14/SE software for analysis. The Joanna Briggs Institutes' quality appraisal tool was used to ensure the quality of the included articles. A random effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence. In this study, a subgroup analysis was employed to examine the potential sources of heterogeneity, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the effect of individual studies on the pooled results. To evaluate publication bias, the funnel plot and Egger's regression tests were employed. The pooled prevalence of occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers was estimated to be 47.35% (95% CI: 34.59-60.11). Among each respiratory symptom, cough was found to be the most prevalent at 38.37% (95% CI: 28.54-48.19). In this study, past dust exposure (OR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.06-4.61), not using facemasks (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.54-3.81), having more than five years of work experience (OR = 3.68, 95% CI: 1.66-5.7), and being between the ages of 38 and 47 (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.07-3.27) were found to be predictor factors with occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers. Furthermore, there is no evidence of publication bias for this study. The findings of this study indicated a significant prevalence of occupational respiratory symptoms among street sweepers. Therefore, it is highly recommended to focus on the provision and proper use of personal protective equipment and to enhance occupational health and safety training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.