ArticlePloS one2025
An exploratory study of associations between judgement bias, demographic and behavioural characteristics, and detection task performance in medical detection dogs.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Balancing consistency and flexibility: exploring trait and state optimism in rats using the cognitive judgement bias test.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical detection dogs search for diseases from remote samples (biodetection) and assist patients with chronic conditions (medical alert assistance). There is scarce information on how dogs' decision-making tendencies relate to task performance. This study explored the relationships between medical detection dog demographics, responses in a behavioural test battery, 'optimistic' or 'pessimistic' decisions in a judgement bias task, and their performance in detection tasks. A sample of 58 trainee and trained medical detection dogs were studied in a Go/NoGo spatial judgement bias test. For trainee dogs (n = 39), training outcome (pass/fail) and trainer ratings of behavioural traits; yielding a composite score of ability in detection tasks, were used as markers of task performance. For trained biodetection dogs (n = 27), scent sensitivity and specificity scores derived during training and testing trials were used. Older dogs (p < 0.001), those showing higher 'Confidence' (p = 0.009), 'Food orientation' (p = 0.014) and 'Playfulness' (p = 0.005) in the test battery, and those who made more 'optimistic' decisions in the judgement bias task (p = 0.002), had higher detection task ability scores. For trained dogs, latency to approach ambiguous stimuli was positively correlated with scent specificity levels (n = 25, p = 0.021), suggesting that more 'pessimistic' dogs tended to be more specific. Our findings suggest relationships between behaviour in judgement bias tests and other learning and discrimination tasks, which may reflect underlying individual or personality differences in affective and/or cognitive processes that influence dogs' style of searching and performance ability in medical detection tasks. Future research is needed to explore these associations further and investigate the value of judgement bias tasks in predicting later search performance in medical and other types of search dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.