Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202962›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Assessing the efficacy of frankincense extract as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis.

Rahaf A Almohareb, Reem M Barakat, Eltayeb E M Eid, Albandari Aldaws, Nourah Alhagbani, Reham Almubayi, Dhuha Alsuwaid, Fahda N Algahtani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rahaf A AlmoharebDepartment of Clinical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reem M BarakatDental Clinics Department, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4952-1400
Eltayeb E M EidResearch Department, Health Science Research center, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-955X
Albandari AldawsDental Intern, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nourah AlhagbaniDental Intern, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0000-1896-8384
Reham AlmubayiDental Intern, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Dhuha AlsuwaidAcademic Researcher, Natural and Health Sciences Research Center, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahda N AlgahtaniDepartment of Clinical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frankincense resin exhibits antibacterial potential against various microorganisms, but little is available on its effectiveness against dental root canal biofilm. This study aimed to assess its efficacy as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. A standard E. faecalis strain underwent antibacterial sensitivity testing with frankincense derived from Boswellia sacra Flück and Boswellia frereana Birdw trees. Frankincense, demonstrating inhibition of bacterial growth, was further evaluated as an irrigant. Root canals of 50 single-canalled human teeth were prepared, then contaminated with E. faecalis and placed into three groups: Group A was irrigated with saline (negative control), Group B was irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), and Group C was irrigated with frankincense. Microbial sampling pre- and post-irrigation was conducted under aseptic conditions. Colony count reduction percentages were calculated, and the data was analyzed using one-way analyses of variance followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (significance level set at 5%). The antibacterial susceptibility test revealed that only Boswellia sacra Flück frankincense was effective against E. faecalis. Both NaClO and frankincense significantly reduced colony counts compared to saline (p <  0.0001), with no difference between frankincense and NaClO irrigation. Therefore, root canal irrigation with B. sacra frankincense proved as effective against E. faecalis biofilm as NaClO. Further exploration of its potential as a root canal irrigant is recommended.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDental Pulp CavityEnterococcus faecalisFrankincensePlant ExtractsRoot Canal IrrigantsBiofilmsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSodium HypochloriteAnti-Bacterial AgentsFrankincensePlant ExtractsRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium Hypochlorite

Identifiers

PMID40202962
PMCPMC11981206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.