ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing the efficacy of frankincense extract as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frankincense resin exhibits antibacterial potential against various microorganisms, but little is available on its effectiveness against dental root canal biofilm. This study aimed to assess its efficacy as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. A standard E. faecalis strain underwent antibacterial sensitivity testing with frankincense derived from Boswellia sacra Flück and Boswellia frereana Birdw trees. Frankincense, demonstrating inhibition of bacterial growth, was further evaluated as an irrigant. Root canals of 50 single-canalled human teeth were prepared, then contaminated with E. faecalis and placed into three groups: Group A was irrigated with saline (negative control), Group B was irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), and Group C was irrigated with frankincense. Microbial sampling pre- and post-irrigation was conducted under aseptic conditions. Colony count reduction percentages were calculated, and the data was analyzed using one-way analyses of variance followed by Tukey's post-hoc test (significance level set at 5%). The antibacterial susceptibility test revealed that only Boswellia sacra Flück frankincense was effective against E. faecalis. Both NaClO and frankincense significantly reduced colony counts compared to saline (p < 0.0001), with no difference between frankincense and NaClO irrigation. Therefore, root canal irrigation with B. sacra frankincense proved as effective against E. faecalis biofilm as NaClO. Further exploration of its potential as a root canal irrigant is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.