Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202959›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Psychometric validation of the Hospital Stress Questionnaire.

Daniel M Ford, Rebecca Lawton, Elizabeth A Teale, Daryl B O'Connor

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel M FordSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-7769
Rebecca LawtonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5832-402X
Elizabeth A TealeAcademic Unit for Aging and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5923-3170
Daryl B O'ConnorSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4117-4093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological stress experienced by inpatients has been shown to be associated with poorer post-hospital outcomes. Research that explores and intervenes to address in-hospital stress and ameliorate negative patient outcomes requires a valid measurement tool. The Hospital Stress Questionnaire (HSQ) was developed for this purpose. The aims of the current study were to psychometrically validate the HSQ, identify latent factors, reduce the number of items within the HSQ, and explore the psychometric properties of longer and shorter versions of the scale.

methodsA nationally representative sample of recent NHS hospital inpatients (N =  660; mean age =  54.0, range =  18-97) completed the HSQ within a survey of patient experiences; 32 of which completed the measure a second time two weeks later. Factor structure, convergent validity, known-groups validity, predictive validity, and test-retest reliability were assessed.

resultsSeven domains of in-hospital stress were identified: quality of care, away from home, inconvenienced, health anxiety, negative effects of treatment, ward environment, and disrupted patient experience. Long (55 items), medium (28 items), and short (10 items) versions of the measure were produced, all exhibiting excellent psychometric properties. The highest rated stressor was "poor sleep".

conclusionThe HSQ is a valid and reliable tool, now available to be used by researchers and clinicians. It has potential to be used in intervention studies to reduce in-hospital stress, and to identify patients most at risk of the effects of post-hospital syndrome.

Indexed as

InpatientsPsychometricsStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40202959
PMCPMC11981188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.