ArticlePloS one2025
Trends and disparities in ischemic stroke mortality and location of death in the United States: A comprehensive analysis from 1999-2020.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of early acetaminophen administration with mortality among critically ill patients with ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Trends and disparities in deaths involving atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and stroke-related conditions among U.S. adults, 1999-2025.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Ischemic Stroke Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes in the U.S.: National Trends and Demographic Disparities From 1999 to 2019.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2025Article
- Evolving trends and challenges in national death data.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStroke remains the fifth leading cause of mortality in the United States, with significant geographical and racial disparities in outcomes. Understanding trends in location of death for ischemic stroke patients is crucial for improving end-of-life care and addressing healthcare inequities. METHODS &
findingsThis retrospective study used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) data to examine ischemic stroke mortality, stratified by urbanization level and race. Age-adjusted mortality rates were calculated using the 2000 US standard population. Age-adjusted ischemic stroke mortality rates increased across all urbanization levels since 2009, with the most pronounced rises in non-metropolitan areas. An increasing proportion of deaths occurred at home, shifting from inpatient medical facilities. Significant disparities were observed in access to specialized end-of-life stroke care, particularly for racial minorities and rural residents. Black/African American individuals and those in rural settings were more likely to die in less specialized environments due to healthcare access barriers.
conclusionsThe findings highlight a critical shift in the patterns of mortality and end-of-life care preferences among ischemic stroke patients over the past two decades. These findings highlight significant shifts in the patterns of mortality and location of death among ischemic stroke patients over the past two decades, with notable differences across urbanization levels and racial groups. The increasing proportion of home deaths and persistent disparities in location of death suggest a need for further research to understand the underlying factors driving these trends and their implications for end-of-life care quality and access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.