ReviewDrugs & aging2025
Management of Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis with Treat-to-Target Strategy.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Age-stratified treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and integrated genetic and single-cell evidence implicating IL6R/TYK2 signaling.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Geroscience insights into difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: the role of unhealthy aging, comorbidity, and therapeutic complexity.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Frontiers in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Emerging Research and Unmet Needs in Pharmacologic Management.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Add-on iguratimod or tacrolimus in methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis not achieving remission with methotrexate: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.BMC rheumatology · 2025Article
- Late-onset rheumatoid arthritis: clinical features, diagnostic challenges, and treatment approaches.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) is increasing. The clinical diagnosis of LORA is essentially the same as that of young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA), but special attention should be paid to the differences in clinical features between LORA and YORA. Undertreatment of LORA can lead to reduced physical function and increased societal burden. The treat-to-target strategy has been successfully applied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but evidence supporting this strategy is still insufficient for LORA. A wide range of factors should be considered and evaluated in addition to age and RA-related factors, including comorbidity/organ damage, psycho-neurological factors, socio-economic factors and frailty. Considering the proportion of patients with LORA achieving clinical remission or low disease activity in observational studies, the treat-to-target strategy could be stratified by age. Patients with LORA aged < 75 years are treated according to the treat-to-target algorithm used for all patients with RA, with clinical remission as the main target and low disease activity as the alternative target. In patients with LORA aged ≥ 75 years, the initial main target is set at low disease activity, which can be escalated to clinical remission with appropriate adaptation of treatment if a favourable balance of effectiveness and safety is struck at the time of achieving low disease activity by 6 months of treatment. Evidence of the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of methotrexate, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, Janus kinase inhibitors and glucocorticoids in patients with LORA is accumulating, but further research is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40202700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.