Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
[
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Radioligand Therapy with Actinium-225 DOTATATE in Patients with Advanced, Metastatic or Inoperable Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Emerging Theranostic Radiometals (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lead radionuclides for theranostic applications in nuclear medicine: from atom to bedside.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Clinical Experience with Targeted Alpha-Emitter Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (α-PRRT) for Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Gamma camera imaging characteristics ofEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose
methods12 patients (9 m/3 w; mean age 71, range 60-84) with progressive metastatic GEP-NET grade 1-3 received diagnostic imaging with [
resultsNo high-grade adverse effects were observed in all patients evaluated with [
conclusionImaging with [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.