ReviewActa neurochirurgica2025
Employing large language models safely and effectively as a practicing neurosurgeon.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ChatNSG: An Overview of Contemporary and Emerging Artificial Intelligence Models for the Neurosurgeon.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities to date in working with a neurosurgical knowledge-base and have the potential to enhance neurosurgical practice and education. However, their role in the clinical workspace is still being actively explored. As many neurosurgeons seek to incorporate this technology into their local practice environments, we explore pertinent questions about how to deploy these systems in a safe and efficacious manner.
methodsThe authors performed a literature search of LLM studies in neurosurgery in the PubMed database ("LLM" and "neurosurgery"). Papers were reviewed for LLM use cases, considerations taken for selection of specific LLMs, and challenges encountered, including processing of private health information.
resultsThe authors provide a review of core principles underpinning model selection, including technical considerations such as model access, context windows, multimodality, retrieval-augmented generation, and benchmark performance, as well as relative advantages of current LLMs. Additionally, the authors discuss safety considerations and paths for institutional support in safe LLM inference on private health data. The resulting discussion forms a framework for key dimensions neurosurgeons employing LLMs should consider.
conclusionsLLMs present promising opportunities to advance neurosurgical practice, but their clinical adoption necessitates careful consideration of technical, ethical, and regulatory hurdles. By thoughtfully evaluating model selection, deployment approaches, and compliance requirements, neurosurgeons can leverage the benefits of LLMs while minimizing potential risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.