ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Assessment of Bacterial Contamination in Semen.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Semen Extenders for Small Ruminant Sperm Preservation: Biological Mechanisms and Emerging Strategies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Semen contamination is one of the main issues of concern in livestock industry. While the presence of some bacteria in semen is considered as normal, high bacterial loads detrimentally affect sperm quality and fertilizing ability, thus having a negative repercussion on the efficiency of artificial insemination. For this reason, the present chapter focuses on the methods used for the assessment of semen contamination in farm animals. Routinely, bacterial culture is performed to assess the overall degree of contamination in sperm samples; in some cases, however, the identification of bacterial species is needed to determine the optimal antibiotic composition of semen preservation media and address whether those bacteria have developed antibiotic resistance. In addition, other techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy, can be used to evaluate sperm-bacteria interaction. This chapter also discusses the strategies to prevent bacteria contamination in semen. As the ejaculate is not a sterile fluid, media for preservation usually include, as aforementioned, antibiotics to avoid bacterial growth. Because of the mounting restriction in the usage of antibiotics, which is due to the increase of bacterial resistance, other approaches to prevent bacterial contamination of semen include preservation at low temperatures (5 °C) and the inclusion of alternative molecules such as antimicrobial peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40202662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.