Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202654›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Techniques to Determine Mammalian Sperm Capacitation.

Joan E Rodríguez Gil, Olga Blanco-Prieto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joan E Rodríguez GilDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain. juanenrique.rodriguez@uab.cat.
Olga Blanco-PrietoDepartment of Animal Science, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of the achievement of the capacitation status in a sperm sample is a very important asset for optimizing most reproductive techniques centered on semen, from freezing to "in vitro" fertilization. However, there is not a single, simple test that can determine the precise capacitation of a sample. This implies that a combined panel of separate tests focused on separate aspects of sperm function must be carried out to obtain a precise knowledge of the functional status of the sample. This work deals with a brief explanation of the most important techniques applied at these moments to determine sperm capacitation, with an emphasis not on the description of each technique, but on the advantages, disadvantages, and main purposes taking into account practical aspects such as the precise target by which a laboratory wants to determine capacitation. In this way, the main aim of this work is to give a practical guide for practitioners of laboratories from separate objectives, from standard semen quality analysis to molecular and/or mechanistic studies of sperm function, for choosing the most adequate tests to determine capacitation basing on the intended precise targets chosen in each case.

Indexed as

Semen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm CapacitationAnimalsHumansMaleMammalsFlux cytometerImmunological techniquesPros & consSpectrophotometrySperm capacitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.