Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202641›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Sperm Selection by Colloid Centrifugation.

Jane M Morrell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biobanking biodiversity: recent strategies, challenges, and opportunities.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jane M MorrellClinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. jane.morrell@slu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colloid centrifugation has several uses within spermatology. It has traditionally been used as a biomimetic method to select the most robust, fertile spermatozoa from a sperm sample. However, any sub-population can be selected, or the spermatozoa can be separated from seminal plasma, by changing the density of the colloid used. The colloids described here are silane-coated silica colloids in a buffered salt solution, optimized for different species. Although various other methods have been reported to select spermatozoa based on one or more physical properties, only colloid centrifugation is suitable for routine use on semen collection stations.Several variants of the method are available, depending on the volume of sample to be processed and the degree of separation required. All of them involve layering the sperm sample on top of the colloid in a suitably sized centrifuge tube, followed by gently centrifugation using a swingout rotor at 300 g for 20 min. After removal of the supernatant, the sperm pellet is resuspended in a suitable medium, depending on the intended use, e.g., semen extender for artificial insemination, cryomedium for sperm freezing, medium for in vitro fertilization. Thus, the method is practical for most semen collection facilities.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationSpermatozoaAnimalsCentrifugationColloidsHumansMaleSilicon DioxideColloidsSilicon DioxideArtificial inseminationAssisted reproduction technologiesBacteriaDNA integrityIntracytoplasmic sperm injectionIn vitro fertilizationNormal morphologySperm motilitySperm selectionViruses

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.