Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202626›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Assessment of Boar Semen Morphology and Morphometry.

Joaquín Gadea

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joaquín GadeaDepartment of Physiology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. jgadea@um.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of sperm morphology is crucial in assessing reproductive health in both humans and animals. In humans, the World Health Organization recognizes the importance of morphology in semen analysis. Similarly, in animal breeding programs, assessing sperm morphology is essential for selecting superior breeding candidates. This review specifically focuses on the pig as a model, given its importance in meat production and as a research model for reproductive biology. Several studies have demonstrated the impact of sperm morphological abnormalities on fertility in pigs, although some studies have reported conflicting results. Understanding the importance of semen morphology evaluation in boar production and describing the changes in semen morphology and evaluation procedures are the main objectives of this review. Factors influencing semen morphological abnormalities, such as breed, age, and environmental conditions, are discussed. Various techniques for assessing sperm morphology, including traditional microscopic evaluation, staining techniques, computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), and advanced imaging techniques, are reviewed. The relationships between morphology and other sperm parameters are explored, and the significance of morphology in the production of seminal doses is emphasized. Finally, future directions and challenges in the assessment of boar sperm morphology are discussed, including advances in imaging and analysis techniques, integration of molecular and genetic approaches, standardization of guidelines, and research into fertility outcomes and long-term follow-up studies. By addressing these challenges, improvements in the diagnosis and reproductive outcomes of individuals with abnormal sperm morphology can be achieved.

Indexed as

SemenSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleSwineMale fertilitySperm function

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.