ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Assessment of Boar Semen Morphology and Morphometry.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Assessment of Sperm Morphology in Liquid-Preserved Boar Semen Using Cytological Stains.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of sperm morphology is crucial in assessing reproductive health in both humans and animals. In humans, the World Health Organization recognizes the importance of morphology in semen analysis. Similarly, in animal breeding programs, assessing sperm morphology is essential for selecting superior breeding candidates. This review specifically focuses on the pig as a model, given its importance in meat production and as a research model for reproductive biology. Several studies have demonstrated the impact of sperm morphological abnormalities on fertility in pigs, although some studies have reported conflicting results. Understanding the importance of semen morphology evaluation in boar production and describing the changes in semen morphology and evaluation procedures are the main objectives of this review. Factors influencing semen morphological abnormalities, such as breed, age, and environmental conditions, are discussed. Various techniques for assessing sperm morphology, including traditional microscopic evaluation, staining techniques, computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), and advanced imaging techniques, are reviewed. The relationships between morphology and other sperm parameters are explored, and the significance of morphology in the production of seminal doses is emphasized. Finally, future directions and challenges in the assessment of boar sperm morphology are discussed, including advances in imaging and analysis techniques, integration of molecular and genetic approaches, standardization of guidelines, and research into fertility outcomes and long-term follow-up studies. By addressing these challenges, improvements in the diagnosis and reproductive outcomes of individuals with abnormal sperm morphology can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40202626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.