Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202624›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Spermatology: Current Methods to Study Sperm Classical Variables.

Alejandro Vicente-Carrillo, Eduardo de Mercado de la Peña, Adrián Martín San Juan, Helena Nieto-Cristóbal, Heriberto Rodríguez-Martínez, Manuel Álvarez-Rodríguez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandro Vicente-CarrilloDepartment of Animal Production, Veterinary Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. alevic05@ucm.es.
Eduardo de Mercado de la PeñaDepartment of Animal Reproduction, INIA-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Adrián Martín San JuanDepartment of Animal Reproduction, INIA-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Helena Nieto-CristóbalDepartment of Animal Reproduction, INIA-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
Heriberto Rodríguez-Martínez *Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (BKV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Manuel Álvarez-Rodríguez *Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It was back in 1677 when most researchers agreed that spermatology started, supported by van Leeuwenhoek's report about sperm discovery when demonstrating his novel microscope. Since then, multiple approaches have been applied to elucidate key aspects of the morphology of the male gamete and whether they would prognose fertility. Curiosity advanced in parallel with the many analytical tools, including the currently highlighted omics, which opened a yet unexplored scenario where researchers are worldwide trying to describe in detail not only the structure but also the mechanism behind sperm function.

Indexed as

SpermatozoaAnimalsHumansMaleAssessmentFlow cytometryMethodologyMorphologyMotilitySpermatozoaStructure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.