ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2025
Is surgeon assessed bone quality during total knee arthroplasty a valid tool to diagnose osteoporosis?
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knee-specific bone quality assessment for cementless total knee arthroplasty candidate selection: a narrative review.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis continues to have a high prevalence amongst people undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The surgeon assessed intraoperative bone quality using a visual analogue scale has a strong correlation with bone mineral density. Surgeon assessment of bone quality has a high specificity(100%) and positive predictive value(100%) in diagnosing osteoporosis and osteopenia.
backgroundPatients undergoing TKA have a high prevalence of osteoporosis. Our aim is to study (a) the correlation of intraoperative surgeon assessed bone quality with bone mineral density(BMD) as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry(DEXA) and (b) the diagnostic strength of intraoperative surgeon assessment of bone quality in diagnosing osteoporosis and osteopenia, in patients undergoing TKA.
methodsWe prospectively recruited 31 patients undergoing TKA. Patients were classified into normal, osteopenia or osteoporosis based on preoperative DEXA. Intraoperatively, the senior surgeon by visual and tactile assessment, graded the bone quality(BQ) using a visual analogue scale(VAS) from 0 to 10, with 10 being the strongest bone. Using the VAS score, we classified patients as normal(≥ 8), osteopenia(5-7) and osteoporosis(≤ 4).
resultsThe Spearman's rho correlation between BMD and VAS was 0.954.(p < 0.001). VAS < 8 to diagnose osteopenia and osteoporosis had a sensitivity of 70.83%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and diagnostic accuracy of 77.42%(p = 0.001). VAS ≤ 4 to diagnose osteoporosis had a sensitivity of 71.43%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and diagnostic accuracy of 93.55%(p < 0.001).
conclusionThe surgeon assessed intraoperative bone quality using a VAS during TKA has a strong correlation with the gold standard BMD as measured by DEXA scan. VAS ≤ 4 can help diagnose osteoporosis, allowing surgeons to augment implant fixation with stem and cement as well as guide osteoporosis treatment postoperatively. VAS < 8 can identify osteopenic or osteoporotic bone, thus allowing the surgeon to better identify weaker bone and help titrate implant choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40202590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.