ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, and cognitive (OVRT-C) responses in 7- to 17-year-old children.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several aspects of oculomotor, vestibular, reaction time, and cognitive (OVRT-C) abilities improve throughout childhood at varying rates and become adult-like at different ages. However, developmental testing of these abilities often focuses on limited age ranges and does not elucidate clear developmental trajectories. The present study utilized high-resolution eye-tracking to evaluate 40 children aged 7-17 years on a comprehensive battery of OVRT-C tests to better understand how and when these abilities develop across childhood. As expected, mean responses on OVRT-C tests showed consistent improvement as subject age increased. We report a high prevalence of saccadic intrusions during smooth pursuit in children and adolescents, more self-paced saccades in older children, decreased auditory and visual RT with age, and fewer errors on the anti-saccade test in older children. We also used the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) modelling to determine whether a two- or three age group division would be most appropriate for each OVRT-C test. For all key OVRT-C metrics, our data support a separation of children into two age groups as opposed to three. While the age group divide varied by OVRT-C test, these data suggest these abilities mature at differing rates, and optimal separations into two age groups rather than three may reflect a slowing of rapid development as OVRT-C performance becomes more adult-like.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.