ArticleAnnals of botany2025
Roots go through rapid hydraulic recovery following moderate water stress.
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPlant dehydration and rehydration cycles are universal phenomena in natural environments, especially in arid environments. Once a moderate water stress is relieved, the plant hydraulic system can recover, but the recovery process across roots, stems and leaves remains unknown. We examined the recovery dynamics of plant hydraulics and photosynthetic activity following moderate water stress in one herbaceous plant (Glycine max) and one woody shrub (Caragana korshinskii).
methodsThe research was conducted on pot-grown plants in a glasshouse and the recovery dynamics of the predawn leaf water potential (ψleaf), hydraulic conductance of the leaf (Kleaf), stem (Kstem) and root (Kroot), stomatal conductance (gs), leaf photosynthetic rate (An) and non-structural carbohydrates (NSCs) were monitored after the plants were released from a moderate water stress. KEY
resultsUnder moderate water stress with decreasing predawn ψleaf, Kleaf and Kroot in both species were more sensitive to water deficit than was Kstem, and the decrease in gs was faster than that in An, resulting in an increase in intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi); NSCs decreased in leaves and stems but accumulated in roots. After rehydration, both species showed a faster recovery in Kroot and Kstem than in Kleaf, and a slower recovery in gs than in An, resulting in an increase in WUEi.
conclusionsThe rapid recovery in Kroot contributes to plant recovery from water stress, and slow recovery in Kleaf limits stomatal reopening, thus reducing transpiration and maintaining high WUEi. These traits enable species to tolerate drought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.