Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202343›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Changes of the Lumbar Spine.

Frank Beyer, Peer Eysel, Jan Bredow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Robotic-assisted fixation with cortical bone trajectory versus conventional pedicle trajectory for short-segment lumbar decompression and fusion surgery: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frank BeyerHospital Porz am Rhein, Cologne; Department for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne.
Peer Eysel
Jan Bredow

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertain specific degenerative changes of the lumbar spine call for a meticulous assessment of the patient's symptoms and of the findings on physical examination and diagnostic imaging. Degenerative disc disease, spinal canal stenosis, facet joint arthrosis, and the resulting deformities are discussed here, along with the appropriate treatment for each condition.

methodsThis narrative review is based on information from pertinent publications retrieved by a search in PubMed.

resultsThe history and physical examination are determinative. The findings of imaging studies are not necessarily correlated with the clinical manifestations. In the absence of red flags such as a new neurologic deficit or a suspected tumor, the patient can be treated conservatively with analgesics, physiotherapy, or specific infiltrations. If no improvement ensues, or if there is an absolute indication for surgery, decompressive and/or fusion techniques are used, depending on the particular abnormality that is present. A randomized controlled trial has shown the superiority of decompression over nonsurgical management for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] mean difference 7.8, 95% confidence interval [0.8; 14.9]). On the other hand, a study of pooled data on fusion procedures yielded a mean difference of -7.39 points in the ODI score favoring surgery [-20.26; 5.47] [p = 0.26]).

conclusionFor many surgical techniques, the supporting scientific evidence is sparse. The authors recommend treatment in a specialized center.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalIntervertebral Disc DegenerationLumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionSpinal StenosisHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40202343
PMCPMC12516344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.