Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202275›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2025

Adaptive sports in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine across Europe: the forgotten therapeutic ally.

Louise Declerck, Karol Hornacek, Alvydas Juocevicius, Markos Sgantzos, Gaëtan Stoquart, Nicolas Christodoulou, Jean-François Kaux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louise DeclerckNeuromusculoskeletal Laboratory, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium - louise.declerck@uclouvain.be.
Karol HornacekDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Alvydas JuoceviciusSpecial Interest Scientific Committees Sports Affairs, European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Markos SgantzosSpecial Interest Scientific Committees Sports Affairs, European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Gaëtan StoquartNeuromusculoskeletal Laboratory, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicolas ChristodoulouSpecial Interest Scientific Committees Sports Affairs, European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Jean-François KauxSpecial Interest Scientific Committees Sports Affairs, European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) units promote health and autonomy. One way to achieve this is through physical activity (PA), yet research shows that individuals with physical impairments are not physically active. One way to motivate them is through adaptive sports (also named para sports), as this allows for a more enjoyable experience. Yet, it is unknown whether such activities are offered in PRM across Europe. The Special Interest Scientific Committees "Sports Affairs" of the European Society of PRM set out to fill this gap of knowledge.

aimTo explore the use of adaptive sports within PRM units in European countries, to collect information on these practices, and to identify any barriers limiting the development of this offer. To investigate how PRM health care professionals view and promote adaptive sports to their patients.

designCross-sectional survey.

settingEuropean PRM units. POPULATION: PRM health care professionals.

methodsAn online questionnaire was developed and disseminated across Europe. Healthcare professionals working in PRM were invited to respond anonymously. Their views on adaptive sports, as well as the actions they undertook to promote it, were scored, and statistical analyses were performed on these scores.

resultsA total of 190 health care professionals, from 31 different European countries, participated. Only 8 of the 31 countries seem to have adopted adaptive sports as a tool in PRM. The main barrier which limited the development of this across Europe was lack of infrastructure. Yet, the majority of health care professionals acknowledge that their patients would largely benefit from such activities.

conclusionsThe offer of adaptive sports in European PRM is poor. Such activities are not systematically presented to patients with physical impairments. There is a need to improve the situation through structural and legislative changes on one end, but also by providing PRM professionals with adequate tools, resources and networks. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: By identifying barriers which limit the use of adaptive sports as a therapeutic tool, this study suggests several strategies to develop this in the European field of PRM, as it may be a way to enhance its effectiveness.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesPhysical and Rehabilitation MedicineSportsSports for Persons with DisabilitiesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40202275
PMCPMC12105041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.