ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025
Development of a Cutting Guide for Osteocutaneous Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Cutting Guide for Osteocutaneous Radial Forearm Free Flap Harvest.The Laryngoscope · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (OCRFFF) is used for the reconstruction of bony head and neck defects. Being a weight-bearing bone, precise harvesting of the radius is required to maintain structural integrity, postoperative forearm function, and to prevent postoperative fracture. A radius cutting guide may allow head and neck surgeons to be more precise and confident in performing bony harvest, and may improve allocation of orthopedic specialist resources.
methodsA custom radius cutting guide was developed in an iterative process with six head and neck surgeons and one hand surgeon. Following design approval, a prospective feasibility study was conducted. Patient-specific cutting guides were created using pre-operative upper-extremity computed tomography (CT) scans. The length and cross-sectional width of harvested radius bone were measured. The length of time using the guide was recorded. Providers were surveyed to assess their perception of cutting guide utility.
resultsA total of eight patients were enrolled, and the cutting guide was used successfully in seven patients. The mean length of the radius harvested was 77.1 ± 13.8 mm. The mean cross-sectional width of the radius planned for harvest was 11.7 ± 1.7 mm. The mean width of the bone harvested was 12.1 ± 1.2 mm, with a mean difference of + 0.81 mm. The mean total time using the guide was 12.94 min (range 10.0-20.1 min). Survey respondents (n = 7) agreed that the guide did not interfere with their ability to harvest radius bone (mean response 9.0 ± 1.3) and that they would utilize the guide in practice (9.4 ± 1.1).
conclusionsPatient-specific cutting guides for OCRFFF harvest are feasible and may improve head and neck reconstructive surgeons' comfort with harvest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.