ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025
Evaluating the Effect of Sex on Mortality Risks in Medieval Ireland.
Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Optimism to Opportunity: New Perspectives on the Osteological Paradox.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Review
- Urban survival, population dynamics and historical transitions in Thessaloniki (316 BC-AD 1500).Archaeological and anthropological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluates the effect of sex on mortality risks in medieval Ireland to advance our understanding of the social, biological, and environmental factors that were deleterious to female health and survival in the past. MATERIALS AND
methodsData on age-at-death and sex was collected on 335 skeletonized individuals from 10 archaeological sites dating to the early medieval (500-1150 ce) and late medieval (1150-1550 ce) periods in Ireland. Transition analysis (TA2) was used to estimate age-at-death for all individuals with visibly fused pelvic and long bone epiphyses. For all other individuals, age-at-death was estimated using dental development and epiphyseal fusion. Morphological traits of the pelvis and cranium and metric measurements were used to estimate sex. A Gompertz-Makeham hazards model with a proportional hazards specification was used to examine the effect of the sex covariate on mortality risks.
resultsThe Gompertz-Makeham hazards model failed to reveal an effect of sex on mortality risks in this context. No significant temporal variation in the effect of sex on the model was observed across sites.
conclusionsThe results failed to find an effect of the sex covariate on the mortality profile using hazards analysis. However, the similar mortality profiles observed between medieval Irish males and females could reflect cultural barriers and/or differential environmental exposures that counteracted the innate female survival advantage observed today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.