ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2025
Recent developments in cystic fibrosis drug discovery: where are we today?
Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Profiling the CFTR Variant Selectivity and Off-Target Interactions of VX-121.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Barriers to the Pharmacologic Rescue of W1282X CFTR.Biochemistry · 2026Article
- Classification models distinguish functional and trafficking effects of KCNQ1 variants to enhance variant interpretation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Building Lay Society Knowledge and Education for Health Technology Assessment and Policy Engagement: Case of CFTR Modulator Access in Brazil.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe advent of variant-specific disease-modifying drugs into clinical practice has provided remarkable benefits for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF), a multi-organ life-limiting inherited disease. However, further efforts are needed to maximize therapeutic benefits as well as to increase the number of PwCF taking CFTR modulators. AREA COVERED: The authors discuss some of the key limitations of the currently available CFTR modulator therapies (e.g. adverse reactions) and strategies in development to increase the number of available therapeutics for CF. These include novel methods to accelerate theratyping and identification of novel small molecules and cellular targets representing alternative or complementary therapies for CF. EXPERT OPINION: While the CF therapy development pipeline continues to grow, there is a critical need to optimize strategies that will accelerate testing and approval of effective therapies for (ultra)rare CFTR variants as traditional assays and trials are not suitable to address such issues. Another major barrier that needs to be solved is the restricted access to currently available modulator therapies, which remains a significant burden for PwCF who are from racial and ethnic minorities and/or living in underprivileged regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.