Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201919›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

Osteoporotic Distal Femur Fractures: An Overview.

Vivek Trikha, Arvind Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vivek TrikhaJPNATC, AIIMS, Room #406, Fourth Floor, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4872-8813
Arvind KumarJPNATC, AIIMS, Room #406, Fourth Floor, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Distal femur fractures in geriatric patients present a significant challenge due to age-related factors, including osteoporosis, comorbidities, and diminished functional reserve. These injuries have high morbidity and require nuanced management strategies to optimize outcomes. In the current chapter, we have reviewed the challenges associated with these intricate injuries and the potential solutions for their favorable outcomes. Method: We reviewed the published literature on epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and current treatment modalities for distal femur fractures in the elderly population, with a focus on advances in surgical techniques, rehabilitation strategies, and outcomes. Discussion: Operative treatment remains the mainstay, tailored to fracture patterns, patient comorbidities, and bone quality. Locking plates offer strong fixation in osteoporotic bone, while intramedullary nails, especially the newer generation ones, provide better biomechanical stability for unstable fracture types. Total knee replacement and distal femur replacement is a viable option in severe cases with comminution or poor bone quality. Conclusion: Distal femur fractures in the elderly are complex injuries with high morbidity and mortality. Early surgical intervention, optimized postoperative care, and a focus on addressing osteoporosis are key to improving outcomes and minimizing the long-term impact of these fractures on the vulnerable population. Favorable fracture healing can be achieved with plates, nails and their combinations as long as they are judiciously used.

Indexed as

Distal femur fracturesFragility fracturesGeriatric traumaLocking plate fixationOsteoporotic fracturesRetrograde intramedullary nailingWeight-bearing

Identifiers

PMID40201919
PMCPMC11973033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.