ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Fixation Failure in Osteoporotic Bone: A Review of Complications and Outcomes.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of three internal fixation strategies for femoral neck fractures: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- [Osteosynthesis for tibial plateau fractures in geriatric patients].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Immunomodulatory-osteogenic dual-functional nanofibers augment screw anchorage in osteoporotic bone.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Mechanostat-Informed Strain Mapping of Osseodensification-Inspired Peri-Implant Densification Versus Conventional Drilling in Osteoporotic-like Low-Density Cancellous Bone: A 3D Static Linear Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparative Assessment of Proximal Humeral Bone Density Using CT Osteoabsorptiometry, Bone Microarchitecture Analysis, and a HU-Based Calibration Method: A CT and Micro-CT Study in Elderly Body Donors (65-86 Years).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Allyl sulfide incorporated polymethyl methacrylate and tricalcium phosphate fibrous composites for osteoblast proliferation investigation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Risk factors for reoperation following operative fixation of patella fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Original Locking Rod System Designed for Diaphyseal Fractures of Long Bones.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporotic bone poses significant challenges for fixation of fractures due to its compromised bone quality. This issue impacts patient outcomes and, necessitate proper understanding of the biomechanical limitations and the adequacy of current fixation devices. Objective: This article aims to address the gaps in literature by examining both the biomechanical and biological factors that contribute to fixation failure in osteoporotic bone, and by analyzing the limitations of current management strategies, with the aim of identifying effective interventions for this vulnerable patient group. What is Already Known: Literature acknowledges that osteoporotic bones have reduced bone density and compromised structural integrity, making fixation devices less effective. Fixation failure frequently occurs in these patients due to diminished bone strength and insufficient fixation support, which collectively hinder optimal stabilization and healing. Gap in Literature: Despite recognition of the high failure rates associated with osteoporotic bone fixation, there is limited literature detailing a comprehensive approach that integrates biomechanical, biological, and technological advancements to improve fixation outcomes. This article reviews current diagnostic techniques and explores potential innovations in materials and regenerative strategies aimed at enhancing fixation success. Which also guide us about need for future research to focus on developing and validating multifaceted approaches that combine advanced fixation materials and bone regeneration technologies to mitigate failure risks and improve patient outcomes. Conclusion: With increasing life expectancy, the incidence of osteoporosis and hence osteoporotic fractures steadily increasing there are multiple fractures which are responsible for this, however as orthopedic surgeon we are required to deal with these fractures in increasing numbers so we need to develop a comprehensive approach to prevention of these fractures' adequate treatment and also the prevention of refractures which are far too common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.