Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201917›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

Fixation Failure in Osteoporotic Bone: A Review of Complications and Outcomes.

John Mukhopadhaya, Janki Sharan Bhadani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk factors for reoperation following operative fixation of patella fractures.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John MukhopadhayaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Paras HMRI Hospital, Patna, Bihar 800014 India.ORCID 0000-0001-9185-6274
Janki Sharan BhadaniDepartment of Orthopaedics, Paras HMRI Hospital, Patna, Bihar 800014 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3329-8355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Osteoporotic bone poses significant challenges for fixation of fractures due to its compromised bone quality. This issue impacts patient outcomes and, necessitate proper understanding of the biomechanical limitations and the adequacy of current fixation devices. Objective: This article aims to address the gaps in literature by examining both the biomechanical and biological factors that contribute to fixation failure in osteoporotic bone, and by analyzing the limitations of current management strategies, with the aim of identifying effective interventions for this vulnerable patient group. What is Already Known: Literature acknowledges that osteoporotic bones have reduced bone density and compromised structural integrity, making fixation devices less effective. Fixation failure frequently occurs in these patients due to diminished bone strength and insufficient fixation support, which collectively hinder optimal stabilization and healing. Gap in Literature: Despite recognition of the high failure rates associated with osteoporotic bone fixation, there is limited literature detailing a comprehensive approach that integrates biomechanical, biological, and technological advancements to improve fixation outcomes. This article reviews current diagnostic techniques and explores potential innovations in materials and regenerative strategies aimed at enhancing fixation success. Which also guide us about need for future research to focus on developing and validating multifaceted approaches that combine advanced fixation materials and bone regeneration technologies to mitigate failure risks and improve patient outcomes. Conclusion: With increasing life expectancy, the incidence of osteoporosis and hence osteoporotic fractures steadily increasing there are multiple fractures which are responsible for this, however as orthopedic surgeon we are required to deal with these fractures in increasing numbers so we need to develop a comprehensive approach to prevention of these fractures' adequate treatment and also the prevention of refractures which are far too common.

Indexed as

Bone remodelingFixation failureNon-unionOrthopedic fixation devicesOsteoporosisOsteoporotic bone

Identifiers

PMID40201917
PMCPMC11973034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.