Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201913›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

Management of Elderly Elbow Fractures.

Ravi Gupta, Anil Kapoor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ravi GuptaParas Hospital Panchkula, Nana Sahib, Haryana India.ORCID 0000-0002-9705-9863
Anil KapoorParas Hospital Panchkula, Nana Sahib, Haryana India.ORCID 0000-0002-0885-898X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Elbow fractures are common in elderly patients with osteoporotic bones, typically resulting from falls on the elbow. Common fracture types include distal humerus, olecranon, and radial head fractures. Occasionally, a combination of these fractures occurs, creating complex injuries such as terrible triad injuries. Accurate evaluation using X-rays and CT scans is essential for optimal treatment planning. Careful preoperative planning, including the decision between non-operative and operative treatment and selecting appropriate surgical implants, is critical for achieving successful outcomes. Objective: This chapter focuses on common elbow fractures in elderly patients and explores the available treatment options. Given the lack of clear consensus on managing elbow fractures in osteoporotic bones, we address the associated complications and highlight various treatment approaches. Current Knowledge: Numerous treatment methods have been proposed for osteoporotic elbow fractures, including various fixation techniques, arthroplasty, and excisions. Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, no method has emerged as superior. Each method has distinct advantages and disadvantages. This chapter aims to compile and compare these options, outlining their respective pros and cons. Conclusions: Elbow fractures in osteoporotic bones present significant challenges for surgeons. Although elderly patients with osteoporotic bones generally have lower functional demands compared to younger individuals, they still require adequate, pain-free elbow function for daily activities. Advances in surgical techniques and implant technology have expanded treatment options for these fractures. Achieving successful outcomes requires selecting the appropriate implant, meticulous preoperative planning, and expert surgical execution tailored to the specific fracture characteristics.

Indexed as

ElbowFracturesOsteoporosisRadial head arthroplastyTotal elbow arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40201913
PMCPMC11973029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.