ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Psychological impact of risk-reducing surgery for gynecologic cancer among women with Lynch syndrome.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Prophylactic total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are risk-reducing surgeries (RRS) that can be offered to women with Lynch syndrome (LS) as they reduce the incidence of ovarian and endometrial cancer. Few studies have examined facilitators to RRS or the experiences of women with LS post-surgery. This qualitative study explored the experiences of women with LS who underwent RRS. Methods: Women with LS who had undergone RRS within the prior 10 years were recruited from a genetic cancer registry and a tertiary care medical centre in Canada. Participants completed interviews over the phone. A qualitative descriptive methodological approach was taken, and interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Fifteen participants completed interviews. Themes identified included: 1) facilitators to RRS including desire for peace of mind, completed family planning, presence of physical symptoms associated with gynecologic cancer, burden of screening, personal or family history of cancer, age, and trust in healthcare providers (HCPs); 2) women's experiences with RRS including post-surgical recovery, long-term physical changes post-surgery, impact of surgery on sexual health, psychological impacts of managing risk, and post-surgical care from HCPs; 3) experiences managing menopausal symptoms and use of hormone replacement therapy; and 4) unmet informational needs including managing expectations prior to surgery, understanding risk related to other health conditions, and questions about the ongoing need for gynecologic cancer surveillance. Conclusions: HCPs should consider facilitators to surgery in women with LS contemplating RRS. HCPs should also provide women with LS more detailed post-surgery information on what to expect, and risks of other health conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.