ArticleCureus2025
Prevalence of Pipelining in the United States Orthopedic Surgery Residency Match.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nationwide Analysis of Pipelining and Medical School Affiliation in the US Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Where Should I Signal? A Program-Level Analysis of Preference Signaling in the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPipelining is the phenomenon whereby applicants from the same medical schools repeatedly match into the same residency programs. We sought to quantify the prevalence of pipelining in the United States (US) orthopedic surgery residency match and to compare these practices amongst geographic regions. METHODOLOGY: Resident information was obtained from program webpages. New programs without five years of residents, programs that did not publicly report resident information, and programs with incomplete information were excluded. For the remaining programs, the pipelining ratio was calculated (pipelining ratio = no. of residents/no. of different medical schools represented over the study duration). We also recorded the proportion of each program's residents that attended the single most represented medical school at each program during the study period and the number of years in which at least two residents from the same medical school matched into a program. Residency program geographic region and the number of medical schools within a 50-, 100-, and 200-mile radius of each program were also recorded.
resultsThe median pipelining ratio amongst programs included (n = 159) was 1.5 (interquartile range (IQR) = 1.32-1.79; Range = 1-4.83). The pipelining ratio varied by geographic region (p<0.01), with programs in the Midwest (p = 0.04) and South (p = 0.04) having a higher pipelining ratio than programs in the Northeast. The proportion of each program composed of the most represented medical school varied by geographic region (p<0.01), with programs in the South having a higher proportion of their classes composed of residents from a single medical school than programs in the Northeast (p<0.01) and Western US (p = 0.03). The pipelining ratio and proportion of each program's residents from a single shared medical school showed no correlation or a very weak negative correlation with the number of medical schools within a 50-, 100-, and 200-mile radius of each program.
conclusionsMost orthopedic residency programs fall within a range of fair to moderate pipelining, though it is more common in Southern US programs. These practices can limit opportunities for qualified applicants and should be monitored due to recent changes in pass/fail scoring of the US Medical Licensing Step 1 Exam and virtual interviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.