Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201845›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Combined effects of

Anila Khan, Shakeeb Ullah, Faiqah Ramzan, Ata Ur Rehman, Saifur Rehman, Kholik Kholik, Akhmad Sukri, Muhammad Munawaroh, Teguh Hari Sucipto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anila KhanInstitute of Biological Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Shakeeb UllahFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Faiqah RamzanFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Ata Ur RehmanFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Saifur RehmanFaculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan.
Kholik KholikDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram City, Indonesia.
Akhmad SukriDepartment of Biology Education, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram City, Indonesia.
Muhammad MunawarohDepartment of Basic Medical Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Mataram City, Indonesia.
Teguh Hari SuciptoInstitute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Wound healing is a complex process involving inflammation, proliferation, and tissue remodeling. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of Methods: Twenty male rabbits were divided into four groups: control (treated with saline), Results: By day 14, the combined treatment group demonstrated the most significant wound closure, reducing the wound area by 75% compared with 50% in the Conclusion: These findings suggest a synergistic effect between

Indexed as

AloePlant ExtractsVitamin EWound HealingAnimalsAntioxidantsDrug Therapy, CombinationMalePlant LeavesRabbitsAntioxidantsPlant ExtractsVitamin EAloe vera (Extract)Antioxidant enzymesCollagen synthesisVitamin EWound healing

Identifiers

PMID40201845
PMCPMC11974294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.