ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Potential toxic elements in edible shrimp and other edible parts: A health risk assessment.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The extent of some integration between organic acids and compounds in controlling parasitic infestation of shrimp.Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pollutant pollution caused by heavy metals is considered a significant problem worldwide. Consuming food, drinking water, and breathing in air are the primary routes through which heavy metals enter the human body. Shellfish are a source of heavy metals for humans, despite being a significant source of protein derived from animals, vitamins, and trace minerals. The influence of seasons on the heavy metal burden in shellfish has received less attention than it should have. Aim: The purpose of this research was to determine the levels of harmful metal residues, including lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As), present in the edible parts of crab and shrimp intended for human consumption. A risk evaluation for human health was also computed, in addition to the predicted daily intakes that were calculated. Method: A collection of crab and shrimp samples was made near the coasts of the Red Sea in Suez city, Egypt, throughout the winter and summer seasons. Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) was used to detect heavy metals such as lead and cadmium, while cold vapor AAS was used to measure arsenic and mercury. Additional computations were made regarding daily intakes as well as potential hazards. Results: The findings of this research indicated that the toxic elements lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury were present in the edible tissues of shrimp and crab samples that were collected from Egypt. Compared with shrimp, crabs in particular displayed larger levels of these components in their bodies. When the samples collected in the summer were compared with those obtained in the winter, it was found that the heavy metal burden in the samples was much higher in the winter. Conclusion: When the potential health hazards associated with consuming such shellfish were estimated, it is possible that the Egyptian population was put in danger due to the presence of harmful metals. Therefore, it is suggested that you reduce the amount of crab and shrimp that you consume on a daily basis, particularly during winter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.