Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201791›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Cardio-cerebral infarction: a narrative review of pathophysiology, treatment challenges, and prognostic implications.

Weiwei Gao, Lingfeng Yu, Jingjing She, Junxuan Sun, Shouyue Jin, Jingjing Fang, Xingyu Chen, Renjing Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weiwei Gao *Department of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, National Advanced Center for Stroke, Xiamen, China.
Lingfeng Yu *Department of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, National Advanced Center for Stroke, Xiamen, China.
Jingjing SheDepartment of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, National Advanced Center for Stroke, Xiamen, China.
Junxuan SunDepartment of Emergency, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Shouyue JinDepartment of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, National Advanced Center for Stroke, Xiamen, China.
Jingjing FangDepartment of Cardiology, West China Xiamen Hospital of Sichuan University, Xiamen, China.
Xingyu ChenDepartment of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, National Advanced Center for Stroke, Xiamen, China.
Renjing ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, National Advanced Center for Stroke, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardio-cerebral infarction (CCI) is a rare clinical syndrome characterized by the simultaneous or sequential occurrence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Despite its complex pathogenesis and more severe prognosis compared to isolated AMI or AIS, no consensus has been established regarding its definition, classification, epidemiology, treatment protocols, or prognostic management. Current research is largely confined to case reports or small case series, and there are no unified diagnostic or treatment guidelines, nor any expert consensus. Consequently, clinicians often rely on single-disease guidelines for AMI or AIS, or personal experience, when managing CCI cases. This approach complicates treatment decisions and may result in missed opportunities for optimal interventions, thereby adversely affecting long-term patient outcomes. This narrative review aimed to systematically summarize the definition, classification, epidemiological features, pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies, and prognostic aspects of CCI while thoroughly examining the progress and limitations of existing studies to guide future research and clinical practice. By offering a detailed analysis of reperfusion strategies, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulation in CCI patients, this review highlights the safety and efficacy differences among current treatments and explores methods for optimizing individualized management to improve clinical outcomes. Furthermore, this article aimed to enhance clinicians' understanding of CCI, provide evidence-based recommendations for patient care, and outline directions for future research. Ultimately, by refining diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, we aimed to reduce CCI-related mortality and improve long-term prognoses for affected patients.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokeacute myocardial infarctioncardio-cerebral infarctionnarrative reviewpathophysiologyprognosistreatment strategies

Identifiers

PMID40201791
PMCPMC11975930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.